Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1194 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Could somebody test this? (xterm or jstar bug)
- From: "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 01:22:10 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1001040108350.32579@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, 2010-01-03 at 19:24 -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
Sorry, I assumed you were in the know.
It wasn't in the last 100 bugs displayed when I went in, at least. Or I didn't see it.
- -- Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAktBNLkACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Wu3wCdFY7w0RO01Za4gjjj62fD/hbh
mNQAn2K5SlpxnDBMuAlvM4iUOz7fUxgL
=jimE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, 2010-01-03 at 19:24 -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 03/01/10 19:19, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Sunday, 2010-01-03 at 20:32 +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:26:24 +0100, you wrote:
Well, I did RFC and trusted Cristian O:-)
When I recommend to open a bug it implies that the OP should first
search for matching bug reports.
When somebody from Novell recomends opening a bugzilla, I take for
granted that he knows already if it is reported or not.
That's rarely possible, unless you were previously Assigned to the bug
or CC'ed.
Sorry, I assumed you were in the know.
Plus, some of your colleagues think that double reporting is good,
because that way it is known that it affects several people. I was told
that on another ocassion, to report anywway. Otherwise, please all of
you agree on a policy and tell us so.
That's why duplicate resolution exists, however ideally it shouldnt be
used ;) I understand that is usually not possible because bugzilla
search engine is broken beyond repair and rarey returns something useful.
It wasn't in the last 100 bugs displayed when I went in, at least. Or I didn't see it.
- -- Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAktBNLkACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Wu3wCdFY7w0RO01Za4gjjj62fD/hbh
mNQAn2K5SlpxnDBMuAlvM4iUOz7fUxgL
=jimE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |