Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2525 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] 11.2 - what was the reasoning behind disabling sshd by default?
- From: Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:16:11 -0500
- Message-id: <1258726571.8769.4.camel@linux-m3mt>
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:11 +0000, Peter Nikolic wrote:
RAID has nothing to do with size. Or the other way around, the more
data you have the more important RAID becomes, because restoring takes
longer.
--
OpenGroupware developer: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://whitemiceconsulting.blogspot.com/>
OpenGroupare & Cyrus IMAPd documenation @
<http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/wmogag/file_view>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Friday 20 Nov 2009 11:50:49 Lars Müller wrote:
Well that actually is not a bad idea at all LVM just clutters things up on awhen we do e.g. LVM andA lot of the features are developed for the SUSE Linux Enterprise
RAID improvements (something the single-user most probably has little
or no need for) on the other end. Is openSUSE slowly developing a
severe schizophrenia?
products. Should we keep them out of openSUSE to paint a nicer picture?
desktop its a flaming pain to have the partitioner trrry to insist on using
LVM even raid now is becoming less useful and in the home even for home
servers sata drives are so darn huge now that raid is almost irrelevent
RAID has nothing to do with size. Or the other way around, the more
data you have the more important RAID becomes, because restoring takes
longer.
--
OpenGroupware developer: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://whitemiceconsulting.blogspot.com/>
OpenGroupare & Cyrus IMAPd documenation @
<http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/wmogag/file_view>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |