Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
My argument has nothing to do with technology at all,
No, it doesn't. And you haven't given a single sound reason why not to have an IPv6 deployment strategy.
Do you not understand me, or do you not want to understand me? I didn't explain how the situation *should* be, but why it *is* as it is. The reason that most companies don't have an IPv6 deployment strategy is that they think that it is not necessary and doesn't contribute to their bottom line. And if I wouldn't be the CEO/CTO of an IT company, I would probably think the same. Repeat after me: "The bottom line counts. Period." Joachim PS: For the record: I know a lot about IPv6, being involved in big-data-center-level deployments. And I know that it is not as easy as you describe, from personal experience with transition teams. Retraining the network ops is not done in one week, that's dreamland. You have very obviously no experience concerning the level of technical expertise of the common IT staff, for me this is my daily business. And now I'll finish my lunch break and continue with that presentation I should be doing instead of posting here... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Joachim Schrod Email: jschrod@acm.org Roedermark, Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org