On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 12:57 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, 2009-10-10 at 23:48 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
Ever thought about going to a rolling-release system with openSuSE? Just seem like so much cleaner way to do a distro. Leave SLES and SLED as the Novell "release" model products, but take openSuSE to a rolling-release model.
I don't think so. It is more unstable.
I have "problems" with 11.0 that are solved in 11.1, and new problems in 11.1 that were not in 11.0. With a rolling scheme I would have no way of installing a version that worked in each situation. There could be snapshots, but no way to patch them, because there would be no patches, just update everything to the newest version.
No, I prefer the current state. If asked, I prefer longer maintenance periods than the current 18 month period.
You mean something like giving the XX.3 release Long Term Support? Sounds nice, though a previous request for LTS has been declined some time ago... (probably too much work involved for the official staff) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org