Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1473 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Stupid Google Redirect URL Utility
- From: Dave Howorth <dhoworth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:12:22 +0100
- Message-id: <4A2E6DC6.6060902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Randall R Schulz wrote:
Sorry, I'm still not understanding. What is 'it'? What I'm trying to
determine is whether I get a page with normal <a> elements containing
direct links to the target pages or not. Viewing the source does indeed
show me the difference.
I think we're talking at cross-purposes but I don't understand what you
are trying to tell me.
And yes, I already know everything that follows.
If you use firebug, you will see that it is making web requests on
mousedown events.
But I am now capturing the correct URL when I Copy Link Location, even
with Javascript enabled. My favourite hypothesis now is that the broken
behaviour is a bug that they have now fixed and are part way through
rolling out. I'd be interested to know what the source of the google
page looks like for other people.
Cheers, Dave
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tuesday June 9 2009, Dave Howorth wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Tuesday June 9 2009, Dave Howorth wrote:Sorry, I don't understand the intent of your comment. But if it is
Clayton wrote:You do realize that it's only the URL that you get if you Copy Link
I was logged in. I now 'signed out' but still get the evil page ifI believe one of them mentioned that it onlyI am logged into Google... I still cannot find a way to duplicate
applied to users logged in to Google itself, which I am.
this new behavior.
javascript is enabled.
Location or Save Link As.., right? If you just click the search
result, the net result is to redirect back through Google to the
actual search hit URL. It's basically transparent to the browser
user for simple link clicks and allows Google to get feedback on
search quality (something I have no problem with).
related, I use View/Message Source to determine which page I'm
getting.
Then you're not going to see it (if you have JavaScript enabled and are
logged in to Google).
Sorry, I'm still not understanding. What is 'it'? What I'm trying to
determine is whether I get a page with normal <a> elements containing
direct links to the target pages or not. Viewing the source does indeed
show me the difference.
I think we're talking at cross-purposes but I don't understand what you
are trying to tell me.
And yes, I already know everything that follows.
I just looked a the source for a Google search results page and you
cannot find any of the result text (link titles or URLs) that appears
in the rendered page. Apparently most of the page's DOM is synthesized
by JavaScript code.
Another interesting aspect of this is that if you just mouse over the
search hit link, the address shown in the lower-left-hand corner of the
browser is the correct link. But as soon as you mouse down (right or
left) on that link it switches to the SGRU. You can see it happen in
the link address feedback (at least on Firefox).
If you use firebug, you will see that it is making web requests on
mousedown events.
But I am now capturing the correct URL when I Copy Link Location, even
with Javascript enabled. My favourite hypothesis now is that the broken
behaviour is a bug that they have now fixed and are part way through
rolling out. I'd be interested to know what the source of the google
page looks like for other people.
Cheers, Dave
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |