Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2008 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Do I dare ....
- From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:41:44 -0500
- Message-id: <200904141141.48553.bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In <49E4AA69.60507@xxxxxxx>, Duaine & Laura Hechler wrote:
That's not a MS-ism. That's a core open-source philosophy: "Release early;
release often.".
Also, while it was a bit lost in the hullabaloo around the releases, KDE 4.0
was released as "for developers only" and KDE 4.1 was released as "for early
adopters". I stayed away from these releases, and I'm quite happy with KDE
4.2. I do understand that there are still some fairly critical (for other)
pieces missing, but it is my daily desktop and has been since Debian and
openSUSE KDE teams provided KDE 4.2 packages in experimental and OBS
respectively.
In summary, I'd say that KDE 4.2.2 is stable but not feature complete. I'm
not sure 4.3 will be feature complete either--there are a lot of missing
features. Of course some thing people are considering missing features
aren't part of KDE. E.g. k3b, amarok, kdiff3, and kaffeine aren't "part of
KDE", they are simply applications that use the KDE libraries. Surely no
one expects the KDE developers to improve ALL the applications that use the
libraries they produced.
It will be unfortunate if openSUSE stops security support for KDE 3.5.10
before KDE 4 is feature complete AND stable.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
It's beginning to sound like the devs for KDE 4 are "doing the MS way".
Yes, we know there are bugs - however - it's good enough - so - we're
going to release it anyway.
That's not a MS-ism. That's a core open-source philosophy: "Release early;
release often.".
Also, while it was a bit lost in the hullabaloo around the releases, KDE 4.0
was released as "for developers only" and KDE 4.1 was released as "for early
adopters". I stayed away from these releases, and I'm quite happy with KDE
4.2. I do understand that there are still some fairly critical (for other)
pieces missing, but it is my daily desktop and has been since Debian and
openSUSE KDE teams provided KDE 4.2 packages in experimental and OBS
respectively.
In summary, I'd say that KDE 4.2.2 is stable but not feature complete. I'm
not sure 4.3 will be feature complete either--there are a lot of missing
features. Of course some thing people are considering missing features
aren't part of KDE. E.g. k3b, amarok, kdiff3, and kaffeine aren't "part of
KDE", they are simply applications that use the KDE libraries. Surely no
one expects the KDE developers to improve ALL the applications that use the
libraries they produced.
It will be unfortunate if openSUSE stops security support for KDE 3.5.10
before KDE 4 is feature complete AND stable.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
| < Previous | Next > |