Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1495 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse] Re: Why am I getting 14.6G zypper.log files?
- From: Jim Henderson <hendersj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:42:13 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <gr091l$d3u$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:15:13 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Feel free to send along to whomever you feel is appropriate - I'm not
subscribed to the project list myself; as a new user (I see it is on
gmane and am adding it to my list now), I wouldn't want to seem
presumptuous on that list to come in and start off with this message. :-)
Certainly, but again I would point back at the common argument that the
community is bigger than Microsoft's development workforce as an
advantage - this statement would seem to contradict the assertion that
one of the benefits of OSS is that it's a community effort instead of a
relative handful of software developers.
Interesting - another reason to consider disabling beagle. I have
mentioned before that I use beagle on occasion, and I find the idea good
(and it generally works for me), but the implementation does leave
something to be desired (and I'm sure plenty on this list would say "at
least!", so let's not reignite that old discussion, please. ;-) )
Weird, I have an external USB drive on my x86_64 system that is reiserfs
and seems to work OK. I even export it over NFS. Is there a bug that I
should be looking at that talks about this issue?
I understand your frustration - as you probably guessed. At the same
time, though, these particular issues would seem to affect even
potentially a small group of users. Things like zypper creating huge log
files potentially affect everyone - or boost breaking encfs (encfs has
some popularity from what I've seen).
I understand the need to prioritise the issues and work on the most
serious ones, and fully support that of course....
...but things like KDE4 (which, like it or not, for 11.0 was something of
a disaster from a PR standpoint at the very least) do distract from
things that affect all users. KDE4 issues don't affect me because I'm a
GNOME user. Core issues in KDE4, though, are best addressed IMHO by the
KDE team and not the openSUSE team. The encfs/boost issue is a packaging/
build issue for the distro. KDE4's usability problems aren't, so I'd
consider that a different class of issue to be addressed by a different
group of people.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----[...]
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, 2009-04-01 at 04:23 -0000, Jim Henderson wrote:
a problem. As a user of the product, I'm a member of the community and
I want to give back in any way I am able to. That's how we make a
better product, right?
I have to agree with all you have said... :-)
I'd like this post to go to the project list, where the right
audience is, but I leave that to you.
Feel free to send along to whomever you feel is appropriate - I'm not
subscribed to the project list myself; as a new user (I see it is on
gmane and am adding it to my list now), I wouldn't want to seem
presumptuous on that list to come in and start off with this message. :-)
Yes, I agree that big issues should be "repaired" on the same distro
version, but I don't know if there are enough resources for that.
Currently we have to wait for the next release to solve that, which
usually means that a new set of bugs will be "released" too. At the end,
we just have to choose which set of bugs we can live with, and choose
the corresponding suse release.
Certainly, but again I would point back at the common argument that the
community is bigger than Microsoft's development workforce as an
advantage - this statement would seem to contradict the assertion that
one of the benefits of OSS is that it's a community effort instead of a
relative handful of software developers.
Currently, I'm staying with 11.0 because there are bugs in 11.1 that
impede me upgrading. The main one was that beagle exercised some
functionality in reiserfs that was broken and caused the kernel to
crash. This has been repaired with the last kernel update, but alas! now
my machine does not fully suspend to disk because it doesn't power off
at the last moment - and as this feature is part of my work routine, I
can't live without it, so, --> no upgrade.
Interesting - another reason to consider disabling beagle. I have
mentioned before that I use beagle on occasion, and I find the idea good
(and it generally works for me), but the implementation does leave
something to be desired (and I'm sure plenty on this list would say "at
least!", so let's not reignite that old discussion, please. ;-) )
At the same time, there are features in 11.0 that are broken: for
instance, writing to an external HD via USB, formatted as reiserfs, is
badly broken, which means that I have to boot 10.3 or 11.1 to do my
saving.
Weird, I have an external USB drive on my x86_64 system that is reiserfs
and seems to work OK. I even export it over NFS. Is there a bug that I
should be looking at that talks about this issue?
Or, another is that mounting LUKS encrypted, reiserfs formatted,
read-only media (DVD) is broken because the kernel tries to _write_ on
the dvd. Another one that is broken, is that writing big files to an
XFS, encrypted, filesystem crashes the system.
I consider all those big issues... but I have no hope of seeing any of
them solved soon. Not in 11.0, perhaps not even in 11.1. Those things
have been appearing over the last 2 years, they are slowly
deteriorating. I expect things that work to keep working... but it is
not the case, things are breaking and they are not solved.
I understand your frustration - as you probably guessed. At the same
time, though, these particular issues would seem to affect even
potentially a small group of users. Things like zypper creating huge log
files potentially affect everyone - or boost breaking encfs (encfs has
some popularity from what I've seen).
I understand the need to prioritise the issues and work on the most
serious ones, and fully support that of course....
Effort seem to concentrate on highly visible features, like kde4.
...but things like KDE4 (which, like it or not, for 11.0 was something of
a disaster from a PR standpoint at the very least) do distract from
things that affect all users. KDE4 issues don't affect me because I'm a
GNOME user. Core issues in KDE4, though, are best addressed IMHO by the
KDE team and not the openSUSE team. The encfs/boost issue is a packaging/
build issue for the distro. KDE4's usability problems aren't, so I'd
consider that a different class of issue to be addressed by a different
group of people.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |