Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1639 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Re: Still think you WEP protection is sufficient for home use?
- From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:47:18 -0800
- Message-id: <200903030947.18925.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
On Tuesday March 3 2009, jdd wrote:
Indeed, and unlike TCP spoofing and man-in-the-middle exploits, to spoof
a MAC address you don't have to coordinate with long-range checksums or
ongoing sequence windowing or serial numbers, so there's very little to
MAC spoofing other than getting the desired 48 bits of MAC address into
the packets.
It's my impression that most link adaptors have a promiscuous mode and
programmable (overridable) MAC addresses, so MAC spoofing is
essentially trivial nowadays.
Randall Schulz
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Vincent Arnoux a écrit :
Hi,
In order to leave my wife enjoy her DS online, I do use a WEP key,
but also have a MAC address filtering on my router. MAC address
spoofing is much more difficult to perform.
nope. Linux can change Mac adress on the fly and any wifi device
broadcast his Mac at first contact
Indeed, and unlike TCP spoofing and man-in-the-middle exploits, to spoof
a MAC address you don't have to coordinate with long-range checksums or
ongoing sequence windowing or serial numbers, so there's very little to
MAC spoofing other than getting the desired 48 bits of MAC address into
the packets.
It's my impression that most link adaptors have a promiscuous mode and
programmable (overridable) MAC addresses, so MAC spoofing is
essentially trivial nowadays.
jdd
Randall Schulz
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |