Is the argument really that tracking people who cannot be bothered to properly identify themselves is more important than improved list use? Messages belong to the list. Period. They do not belong to the individuals. If you ask a question in the list, expect the answer to be there, not as private correspondence. The list is not a private source of information for anyone. It is a shared resource. The resource is the list. If all answers do not go to the list, then he list suffers.
exactly. how retarded is that. i have always wondered. you can only post to the list when you are on the list. everybody posts, everybody gets. real world scenario could be like a public group meeting in a room, common interest, comming goals, everbody helps each other, various expert levels and so on. you can imagine. somebody starts shouting a question for everybody to hear, and then all of a sudden some conversation developing between exactly two people only, and the others left outside. nobody can profit from the information they share. its exactly the list owners and list managers who can ameliorate the situation. we are sick and tired of unsubscribe messages to the actual list every week or so, of double and tripe copies of emails that already went to the list, or zero-copies and private messages that never actually arrive on the list. this sickens me beyond belief that i am again seeing these pathetic answers of the list-maintainers and staff that they apparently are unable to fix the situation or just dont see the point. wtf is the use of this list if things constantly ooze out of the list boundaries or people get spammed countless times with useless copies. this is unbelievable and outrageous. but apparently symptomatic to suse code of conduct. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org