Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Monday, 2008-11-03 at 13:24 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I think reiserfs is more resilient in this situation. At lest, it checks faster.
I can't compare them, but it seems to me that no filesystem can guarantee clearing the appropriate "dirty" bit when power is lost at precisely the wrong nanosecond. I'm no expert though.
Absolutely, there is no guarantee. And when reiserfs really fails, it fails royally.
That is why, several years ago, I bought a duplicate of my primary drive and every major change gets rsync'ed to my backup drive Oddly enough, I have had great luck with reiserfs and just fair luck with ext3. -- Duaine Hechler Piano, Player Piano, Pump Organ Tuning, Servicing & Rebuilding Reed Organ Society Member Florissant, MO 63034 (314) 838-5587 dahechler@charter.net www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com -- Home & Business user of Linux - 10 years -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org