Kai Ponte wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 05:15:21 pm John Andersen wrote:
You mention that you want KDE 4 to be comparable to KDE 3. That is not it's goal. It's goal is to be better than KDE 3. Its failed miserably. By the way... How can you use terms like "better" if you reject the ability to compare?
Stepping into the fray...
If KDE 4 is to be "better" than KDE 3 then there has to be the ability to do everything the previous version did in some fashion or another.
QUITE right, Kai!! However, the devs don't want to hear that. It's like they want to force a simplistic 'Bloze type GUI down everyone's throat. We we don't have the control over the desktop EQUAL to 3.5, then it's NOT a viable desktop, IMHO. Either they get their heads of of the sand and do what's needed to get ALL of the 3.5 functionality in 4.*, or it's NOT going to be used by most current KDE users. I'm prepared to switch ALL clients and my own boxen to Gnome, as I don't think the devs. really give a flip as to what we think. And, no....I'm not going to make a list of what's missing. Those who've worked on the code should KNOW what all the features of 3.5 are!! Fred -- "Politicians and diapers need to be changed regularly -- and for the same reason." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org