Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2803 mails)

< Previous Next >
[opensuse] Re: A BIG "show stopper" for openSUSE at the corporate level anyway!!
  • From: Jim Henderson <hendersj@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <g52uuh$ie3$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:00:47 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:

That resolves any issue with executable viruses. OK, so how about
macro viruses?

Samething. Scan on download. Or have scan on load on the program
executing the macro.

Yeah, so an extra layer in the application rather than have it done one
way at the OS level. I can't see that making sense - it's like saying
"every download manager ever created must have built-in virus scanning".
Why reinvent the wheel in each application? I thought one of the
benefits of using *nix systems in general was that things tend to be
built on special-purpose components. Like Mandvd, it doesn't reimplement
ffmpeg/mplayer/transcode, it calls them. It doesn't implement its own
DVD authoring suite, it uses dvdauthor.

The whole idea of most application development in Linux seems to me to be
code reuse and not making every application implement its own way of
doing things.

I'm just really puzzled by this attitude that each application should
implement its own virus scanning - that seems so antithetical to the
whole idea of how programs are developed on the platform.

I certainly do not want scan on read on every single file in my system.
Not in Linux. That's one of the reasons I use Linux: I do not need it.

Well, sure, that's also a reason I use Linux. But you and I are *smart*
users. Not all users have our saavy. As the Linux user base grows, the
average level of expertise the user has is going to drop farther and
farther.

Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread
Follow Ups