Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2460 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] A BIG "show stopper" for openSUSE at the corporate level anyway!!
- From: "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 01:08:38 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0807090106390.6698@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2008-07-09 at 00:03 +0200, Hans Witvliet wrote:
But how would on-access-scan protect against that?
- -- Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIc/N3tTMYHG2NR9URAtohAJ4/ldh6Arn88N1lvdBBwpQPP2nPyACfcJjU
/J6fBAh82uIzsVSFE/dk7ts=
=5/YX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2008-07-09 at 00:03 +0200, Hans Witvliet wrote:
Well, I disagree with them. On-access IS needed now and even more in the
future!
But it is not needed for linux. It is only needed for linux boxes doing
file serving for windows boxes! Ie, it can be better handled directly from
samba, not from the kernel.
Excuse me,
Aren't you aware that there _are_ files that are harmfull for
linux/slowarez etc etc???? Rootkits, backdoors and all sort of nice
"features" that can be included into usefull programs, Just waiting to
be excecuted once as root.
But how would on-access-scan protect against that?
- -- Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIc/N3tTMYHG2NR9URAtohAJ4/ldh6Arn88N1lvdBBwpQPP2nPyACfcJjU
/J6fBAh82uIzsVSFE/dk7ts=
=5/YX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |