On Saturday 05 July 2008, auxsvr@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2008, Larry Stotler wrote:
in this story which speaks of dissatisfaction among the developers so strong .that some were speaking of a fork to get back to the usability of KDE3: http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/kde-developer-quits/
What usability problem might that be? The guy asking for a fork complains about plasma in specific, I imagine that it would have been far easier for someone to simply port kicker, desktop etc from KDE3 to KDE4 instead of forking the entire codebase. I doubt he really knew what he was talking about. Pruned
The big problem we have here is there are basically 2 schools one me included thinks KDE4 is a pile of (********) file to suit tastes then there are those that find the bugs errors slowness ect all part of the fun . I like Linux i like KDE 3.5.9 but i use a computer and expect it to behave reasonably well which is the reason a lot of people move away from M$ Corps rubbish , But as i and many others have said before KDE4 is not ready for use as the PRIME mover in a distro yet give it a few more months then maybe the setup menu choices are badly marked something that was said when the decussioj first took place certain people thought they knew better we will see 11.0 is a no go so far for me and KDE4 is completely out of the question . -- SuSE Linux 10.3-Alpha3. (Linux is like a wigwam - no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org