Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2333 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Are there ANY compelling reasons to upgrade to 11.0?
- From: "Jayson Rowe" <jayson.rowe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 14:11:25 -0400
- Message-id: <9513077a0807041111i75c4e790v396675c0e29cd3d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Michael S. Dunsavage <mikesd@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think the "should I upgrade to 11.0" debate may be quite different
depending on if you are a KDE or a GNOME user. If you are a KDE user,
you might be well served by sticking w/ 10.3, and perhaps upgrading to
3.5.9 via the build service if you are happy with your current set up
- same for a GNOME user - just upgrade to the latest GNOME via build
service and wait until 11.1 if everything is set up now to your specs,
and working properly. If you happen to be a KDE user and want to use
KDE 4, I'd recommend updating to the latest dev. version of KDE just
like Michael did, as most report it's a leaps and bounds better than
the 4.0.x that released w/ 11.0, and stay w/ the updates all the way
to KDE 4.1.
Personally, I'm a GNOME user, and I upgraded to 11.0, and I'm happy I
did - there wasn't any "big" changes in the GNOME desktop in 11.0
(other than a newer version of GNOME), but I think the combination of
improvements in kernel 2.6.25 + gcc 4.3 have made things faster over
all, and you can't ignore the improvements in zypper which make
package management a dream over any 10.x version IMHO.
I do always tend to have the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"
mentality w/ software sometimes, but I think 11.0 is a solid release
over-all.
--
-jayson
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I have KDE4 in a VM, and am slowly building a list of all the
inadequacies in the
"CORE" features of KDE4.
Without a running KDE3 to compare it to, most users "say" it works,
but then don't
want to look foolish by coming back and posting things that don't
work, AND since
most users overwrite their KDE3 they have nothing to compare it to.
--
----------JSA---------
"Ubuntu" is an African word meaning "Suse is too hard for me".
I did a one-click install for 4.0.84 of KDE and I think it's not bad.
Every day there are software updates for it in the updater. But, that's
okay because it seems those updates are making it more and more stable.
That's just my opinion. YMMV.
--
Michael S. Dunsavage
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I think the "should I upgrade to 11.0" debate may be quite different
depending on if you are a KDE or a GNOME user. If you are a KDE user,
you might be well served by sticking w/ 10.3, and perhaps upgrading to
3.5.9 via the build service if you are happy with your current set up
- same for a GNOME user - just upgrade to the latest GNOME via build
service and wait until 11.1 if everything is set up now to your specs,
and working properly. If you happen to be a KDE user and want to use
KDE 4, I'd recommend updating to the latest dev. version of KDE just
like Michael did, as most report it's a leaps and bounds better than
the 4.0.x that released w/ 11.0, and stay w/ the updates all the way
to KDE 4.1.
Personally, I'm a GNOME user, and I upgraded to 11.0, and I'm happy I
did - there wasn't any "big" changes in the GNOME desktop in 11.0
(other than a newer version of GNOME), but I think the combination of
improvements in kernel 2.6.25 + gcc 4.3 have made things faster over
all, and you can't ignore the improvements in zypper which make
package management a dream over any 10.x version IMHO.
I do always tend to have the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"
mentality w/ software sometimes, but I think 11.0 is a solid release
over-all.
--
-jayson
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |