Pete Connolly wrote:
Matt Archer wrote:
Anders Johansson wrote:
Matt Archer wrote:
Responding with two aliases to the same post now, aaron? Are you trying to make it look as if you're not alone in your opinion?
Your comments are becoming less and less valid.
Yes, KDE developers need bug reports so they can see which functionality people consider important.
Why should anyone fill out bug reports for obscure functionality when basic functionality is still missing. You do that because that's the only valid way for people to add in the missing pieces of code. If you don't tell anyone, nothing changes.
In the time that you and the more vocal complainers have spent bitching to the list about 'KDE4 != KDE3', you could probably have filed 10 bugs and started the process of improving KDE. You prefer to bitch instead of doing something positive
How does telling the devs what they already know, and forcing them to answer inane bug reports improve the process, or do anyhing positive. Unlike you, the KDE devs fully ACKNOWLEDGE that KDE 4 is grossly incomplete. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org