Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2391 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Re: Suse 10.3 install - oh dear (rant only)
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 10:37:45 +0200
- Message-id: <m3iqx54dra.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Edmund Fitzgerald <edmund.fitzgerald75@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Aaron Kuklis was banned from the list in October due to violent
violation of the mailing list netiquitte. He came back under disguise
as Sam - and I see no reason to unban Aaron.
Edmund, this is the wrong forum for any 11.0, we have discussed on the
appropriate list where the current status was agreed on by all involved.
And "put an adult in charge" is a not respectfull to Coolo!
Aaron asked with rather hostility and was not willing to understand
anything.
This is the wrong forum for this. We had initially only KDE4 there and
then discussed (but not on *this* mailing list) to add KDE3 as well -
and discussed also how to do it properly. The consensus there was that
this is the right way. We did also some tests with users on this.
We even discussed AFAIR during one of our IRC meetings...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform/openSUSE, aj@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
[...]
And then when they banned Sam from a list just because he was
asking questions which made the SUSE people uncomfortable is
Aaron Kuklis was banned from the list in October due to violent
violation of the mailing list netiquitte. He came back under disguise
as Sam - and I see no reason to unban Aaron.
the absolute height of bad form -- this compounds the original
insult of blowing off the users concerns. Isn't it much better
to satisfy the user-base by changing a few words on an install
screen to address the problem he's concerned about than to
create the impression that the SUSE product is run by a bunch
of insecure goons who can't handle constructive criticism.
It's clear the level of frustration he was feeling when he
asked repeatedly for someone at SuSE to "put an adult in
charge" of the 11.0 distribution -- precisely because of the
thoroughly unsatisfactory answers coming out of the SUSE folks.
Edmund, this is the wrong forum for any 11.0, we have discussed on the
appropriate list where the current status was agreed on by all involved.
And "put an adult in charge" is a not respectfull to Coolo!
For all I know, technologically, the 11.0 release will be
very good -- but the answers coming from the team come off
as anywhere from blase' disinterest for the concerns of those
raising them to barely concealed contempt and hostility
for even asking questions.
Aaron asked with rather hostility and was not willing to understand
anything.
Perhaps this is a difference in the U.S. vs European culture,
(and I would put UK culture closer to American culture than
European, as the initial philosophical view of the colonists
was that they were Englishmen first, and the Revolution was
merely the last resort to securing their rights, as Englishman,
which the Crown was denying them solely because they weren't
living on the home islands.) as the European point of view
is rather more stratified and specialized, and "the experts"
are generally not to be questioned by the public. However,
it seems to escape the SUSE people that many of those who
have been prodding them for better answers have actually
been in the Unix and/or IT field longer than the SUSE people
themselves. Some of us still have nostalgiac memories of
PDP-11's running version 7 Unix and/or 2.x BSD (even though
these same machines were thoroughly thrashing with as few
as 10 users).
-
Anyways, about the KDE 3 vs KDE 4 discussion, I think it's
a valid concern coming from those who deal with people who
are completely new to Linux, and oftentimes suggest it to
people who are willing to try something new -- that the
KDE 3/KDE 4 issue be handled properly--not only for the
sake of Novell and SUSE, but for the Linux community as
a whole.
When suggesting to a complete Linux neophyte that they try
SUSE 11.0, do we really want to rely on the recollection
of said neophyte to remember any caveats about KDE 4, when
they probably didn't understand the verbal warning in the
first place? (it's difficult to remember a message which
you never understood to begin with). People don't want
to suggest something to a friend, and then have it
blow up in the friend's face, and have it harm their
friendship or business connection.
These sorts of effects seem to be completely ignored by
the SUSE 11.0 folks, and yes, that seems to be making a
lot of the list subscribers annoyed, because they get the
feeling that the SUSE team is making a distro which is
going to have a big "gotcha" in the install phase, and
which will likely bite ANY new/neophyte user.
This is the wrong forum for this. We had initially only KDE4 there and
then discussed (but not on *this* mailing list) to add KDE3 as well -
and discussed also how to do it properly. The consensus there was that
this is the right way. We did also some tests with users on this.
We even discussed AFAIR during one of our IRC meetings...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform/openSUSE, aj@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
| < Previous | Next > |