Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2391 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse] Suse 10.3 install - oh dear
  • From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 20:39:42 +0200
  • Message-id: <g025pe$8lr$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
John wrote:

Think you have missed the point - I came to the conclusion that suse
just wouldn't accept intel ich7 soft raid so I disabled it completely
and suse still insisted on trying to raid it and Grub still threw
errors.

If you are installing onto a system with no built-in RAID etc., I'm 99%
certain SUSE will have no problem. Most of my systems have no built-in
RAID, and on those that do, it's disabled. I've never had a problem
installing 10.3, except for the issue with the MD RAID version in the
superblock that I mentioned earlier.

Actually I wouldn't be at all surprised if the the linux io
available at boot is perfectly capable of handling ich7 raid - the
only problem being the data passed to grub by the install.

Possibly - although if you google for 'linux ich7 raid', it doesn't look
too rosy.

Should also point out that I would like to see linux being used by
more and more people. Hence my rant aspect. I can't help it. The
problems I have outlined are enough and have put a lot of people off.

John, to be honest, the problem you've _barely_ outlined is most
probably not a real problem. But, you've disabled the ICH7 RAID, so if
your box doesn't install cleanly now, you really need to open a
bugreport. Alternatively, you can provide us some real diagnostics to
work on, and we can help you work it out.
I spent a number of years writing system software in assembler for IBM
S/390 - if a customer asked us to diagnose a problem, but neglected to
provide a dump or a trace or refused to set up a SLIP trap, well ...


/Per Jessen, Zürich

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread
References