Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2391 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Suse 10.3 install - oh dear
- From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 16:14:01 +0200
- Message-id: <g01m7a$6ug$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
John wrote:
How do you define "unraid" ? You probably didn't change the partition
types.
I think the only problem I've had with 10.3 and RAID is that it create
the RAID superblock with a version that is incompatible with LILO -
there's a bug report on that. Maybe it applies to GRUB too?
AFAIR, it doesn't do that automatically. You have to say "yes, please"
and click a button.
The internet has room for all kinds :-)
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Disks were fake raided which caused the installer to give grub
something it couldn't cope with. All files were correctly installed. I
unraided them and suse still insisted it was a raid disk.
How do you define "unraid" ? You probably didn't change the partition
types.
I think the only problem I've had with 10.3 and RAID is that it create
the RAID superblock with a version that is incompatible with LILO -
there's a bug report on that. Maybe it applies to GRUB too?
Right at the end it noticed a home directory with my user name and
changed the ownership for me. Fine in this case but what if it had
been 10.0.
AFAIR, it doesn't do that automatically. You have to say "yes, please"
and click a button.
Out of interest a number of people on the web seem to think that ntldr
is the way forwards.
The internet has room for all kinds :-)
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |