Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3562 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse] Re: LVM/EVMS (was: ext3 check forced = frustration)
  • From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:41:26 +0100
  • Message-id: <fpepqm$5s6$4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Carlos E. R. wrote:

But it forces to repartition the entire drive, and I don't feel LVM
is as safe.

It's not, which is why I don't use it.

All LVM partitions rely on the filesystem holding the LVM table
to remain uncorrupted. Corruption on *THAT* filesystem can
very well destroy your LVM partitioning. :-/

Any other suggestions for something that will let me expand my
filesystem on my systems that must be kept running 365x24?

LVM and EVMS are both actually used quite a lot because they solve a
real problem. Similar systems have been in use in e.g. AIX and HPUX
for over 10 years.

That's true, but it is not a solution for those of us having twenty
physical partitions already in a drive.


Whether it is the right solution for you or someoneelse is a different
issue. I was responding to the suggestion that LVM is not safe.



/Per Jessen, Zürich

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >