Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3031 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] OpenSuse 11
- From: James Knott <james.knott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:40:16 -0500
- Message-id: <47AC85F0.8060801@xxxxxxxxxx>
Randall R Schulz wrote:
Here's some Wikipedia stuff on it. My impression is that there are a
lot of good employees at Microsoft who want to do the right thing,
including the engineers, but they get overruled by Bill & Steve, if for
competitive advantage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft
--
Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Friday 08 February 2008 07:52, jdd wrote:
Randall R Schulz a écrit :
even Microsoft would commit such a technological travesty for thefact is many windows applications don't run at all if not used as
sake of thwarting a lawsuit or some regulations.
administrator, and this opens all.
Be that as it may, there is a huge difference between running an
application (or all applications) with administrative privileges and
being a part of the kernel. The former, while something we all know and
agree is a bad idea, is not an engineering travesty (it's a security
travesty). The latter most certainly is an egregious violation of OS
design principles. And while I do think Linux is technologically
superior to Windows in very many ways, I don't think MS OS engineers
are foolish enough to put application code in the kernel.
Here's some Wikipedia stuff on it. My impression is that there are a
lot of good employees at Microsoft who want to do the right thing,
including the engineers, but they get overruled by Bill & Steve, if for
competitive advantage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft
--
Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |