Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3318 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] [OT] Einstein's Plagiarism
- From: Philippe Landau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:13:47 +0100
- Message-id: <4780011B.5030003@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Anders Johansson wrote:
Galileo broke a dogma but was no crackpot.
Labelling messengers of differing insights as "crackpot" and "crank"
are indicators of someone loosing a debate.
The catholic church is famous for smearing Galileo for example
when their fraudulent dogma was exposed.
Einstein's theories are flawed and if you look up his
1905 paper you will see that he does not credit the sources
he plagiarised:
"E = mc2 can be attributed to S. Tolver Preston (1875), to Jules Henri
Poincaré (1900; according to Brown, 1967) and to Olinto De Pretto (1904)
before Einstein. Since Einstein never correctly derived E = mc2 (Ives,
1952), there appears nothing to connect the equation with anything
original by Einstein."
The sources are detailed in the papers quoted above.
Of course you won't touch them because they are works of "Crackpots" :-)
Cognitive Dissonance arises when you build your life on lies
and discover they are lies, you tend to hold on to them
so as not to loose all you strived for and the sense of your life's
work. This happens all the time. Discovery of Bush's involvement in 9-11
is a prominent current example gripping many. Science is advanced by
those able to let go once a theory is replaced by another one better
supported by emerging evidence.
Kind regards Philippe
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Saturday 05 January 2008 21:40:14 Philippe Landau wrote:You can either erect dogmas or advance science.
Anders Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 05 January 2008 21:02:53 Philippe Landau wrote:If you like sources maybe refer to:
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:Rule number 1 on cranks and crackpots: a paper that only quotes secondary
"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." -His plagiarism interfered just as much.
Albert Einstein
http://nexusmagazine.com/articles/einstein.html
sources and encyclopaedias is not written by a competent person
The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein
by Christopher Jon Bjerknes 2006
or
The Einstein Hoax - The Disastrous Intellectual War On Common Sense
(H.E.Retic 1997)
I said primary sources. And Bjerknes also claims that special relativity is
wrong, not just plagiarised, so he's clearly a crackpot
Learn to evaluate your sources
Galileo broke a dogma but was no crackpot.
Labelling messengers of differing insights as "crackpot" and "crank"
are indicators of someone loosing a debate.
The catholic church is famous for smearing Galileo for example
when their fraudulent dogma was exposed.
Einstein's theories are flawed and if you look up his
1905 paper you will see that he does not credit the sources
he plagiarised:
"E = mc2 can be attributed to S. Tolver Preston (1875), to Jules Henri
Poincaré (1900; according to Brown, 1967) and to Olinto De Pretto (1904)
before Einstein. Since Einstein never correctly derived E = mc2 (Ives,
1952), there appears nothing to connect the equation with anything
original by Einstein."
The sources are detailed in the papers quoted above.
Of course you won't touch them because they are works of "Crackpots" :-)
Cognitive Dissonance arises when you build your life on lies
and discover they are lies, you tend to hold on to them
so as not to loose all you strived for and the sense of your life's
work. This happens all the time. Discovery of Bush's involvement in 9-11
is a prominent current example gripping many. Science is advanced by
those able to let go once a theory is replaced by another one better
supported by emerging evidence.
Kind regards Philippe
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |