Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3156 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: NFS sync vs. async mounts (was Re: [opensuse] OpenSuse 10.2 - Fortran compilation very slow through NFS network with a 64bit server and 32bit clients.)
- From: Aaron Kulkis <akulkis00@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:40:58 -0500
- Message-id: <476F0E2A.4070102@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hans Witvliet wrote:
That's standard practice in up-to-date IT departments.
It's not a big deal.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 23:10 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswanhuh? You're connecting each client to the server using vpn on the *local LAN*?
for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for
connecting several locations. Works ok.
That doesn't sound like a very good configuration
nfs4 + kerberos gives authentication and encryption and requires very little in the way of configuration. No offense, but VPN on a local LAN is just silly
Well, at my work they're rather paranoid.
For some, we have to tunnel internet through the corporate network,
For others, we tunnel our corporate network with voip over public
networks.
Indeed, sounds odd, it is odd, but true.
That's standard practice in up-to-date IT departments.
NFS4 is still on my "to investigate" list
It's not a big deal.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |