Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3156 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: NFS sync vs. async mounts (was Re: [opensuse] OpenSuse 10.2 - Fortran compilation very slow through NFS network with a 64bit server and 32bit clients.)
- From: Anders Johansson <ajh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:58:59 +0100
- Message-id: <200712231258.59276.ajh@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Sunday 23 December 2007 08:10:47 primm wrote:
nfs is good, it mostly just works. But v3 has drawbacks in security, so if
you're not in total control of the network, it might not be so good
nfsv4 + kerberos can provide real authentication and encryption though, so you
still don't have to abandon nfs
Anders
--
Madness takes its toll
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:04 Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 11:10, primm wrote:
NFS is kind of ugly itself, don't you think?
Ugly? Naah! It's soooo neat. With nis and nfs anyone can login
anywhere and get their own files and start work right after they've
got a coffee. It just works. Just like NT server before someone
downloded a virus.
Well, I guess if someone else is configuring and maintaining it, sure,
it's wonderful.
I setup an nfs server to export /home to 5 other clients. The same server
handles nis logins. No eggageration, it took me 1/2 hour most of which was
reading man exports until I discovered that Yast had read it for me
already! I'll bet that some gurus on this list could do it in 5.
Just curious, but what are my alternatives for nfs?
Love from L
nfs is good, it mostly just works. But v3 has drawbacks in security, so if
you're not in total control of the network, it might not be so good
nfsv4 + kerberos can provide real authentication and encryption though, so you
still don't have to abandon nfs
Anders
--
Madness takes its toll
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |