Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3263 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Beagle under 10.3 is really eating up my CPU
- From: "Rajko M." <rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:40:16 -0600
- Message-id: <200712172040.16951.rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sunday 16 December 2007 04:19:48 pm Linda Walsh wrote:
info:nice
"Nicenesses range at least from -20 (resulting in the most favorable
scheduling) through 19 (the least favorable)."
Beagle is actually silent helper in background.
There was problem in initial release of 10.2 where it was started Beagle and
mandb. Running both on same hard disk made system sluggish, and that happened
on every boot, few minutes after GUI was up.
Many users noticed Beagle and missed to see mandb, and since removing one of
programs that were competing for hard disk access made situation much better,
Beagle earned bad reputation and it is still comming back trough Google
search.
Beagle-helper runs now with nice=19, so it is already the lowest priority and
it will not make problem even on initial indexing. The beagled runs with
nice=7, so it is also below most processes in the system.
--
Regards,
Rajko
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Gary Baribault wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone else seeing Beagle really kill performance? I have disabled
it and my machine finally is perky, but every now and then, I find it
in memory again. How do I arange it to chew up less memory and CPU or
kill it once and for all?
---
Might try making sure the "cfq" block algorithm is being used,
then set 'beagle' to run at lowest priority (nice -19 beagle-start-script).
info:nice
"Nicenesses range at least from -20 (resulting in the most favorable
scheduling) through 19 (the least favorable)."
That should help it not use so much CPU, and, if cfq is working
well, it should set beagle's disk priority to near lowest as well.
Of course, if beagle is using 500MB and you only have 512MB, you are
likely to get "alot" of swapping.
I'd also wonder, does beagle use "alot" of resources during
some initial "full-index" phase, after which it can run with less resources
as it does incremental updates...?
BTW -- anyone compared it to "swish" (another full-system indexing util
with web-based interface).
Linda
Beagle is actually silent helper in background.
There was problem in initial release of 10.2 where it was started Beagle and
mandb. Running both on same hard disk made system sluggish, and that happened
on every boot, few minutes after GUI was up.
Many users noticed Beagle and missed to see mandb, and since removing one of
programs that were competing for hard disk access made situation much better,
Beagle earned bad reputation and it is still comming back trough Google
search.
Beagle-helper runs now with nice=19, so it is already the lowest priority and
it will not make problem even on initial indexing. The beagled runs with
nice=7, so it is also below most processes in the system.
--
Regards,
Rajko
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |