Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3156 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Re: [OT] British time
- From: Fergus Wilde <fwilde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:03:54 +0000
- Message-id: <200712051003.55127.fwilde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 16:11, Hans Witvliet wrote:
After the First World War in the US, they took what appeared the logical step
and outlawed the admittedly toxic and often socially and medically damaging
substance, alcohol, altogether. You can probably justify such a step if you
are of an authoritarian bent that permits of the idea that the state can and
should criminalise behaviour that harms us.
But I suspect most of our US friends will agree that the result of prohibition
was not that US society became more sober, industrious, and comprised largely
of people with splendidly healthy livers, but that organised crime was handed
a leg up so massive that eighty years later the effects are still being felt.
You cannot legislate for good intent.
--
Fergus Wilde
Chetham's Library
Long Millgate
Manchester
M3 1SB
Tel: 0161 834 7961
Fax: 0161 839 5797
http://www.chethams.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 07:56 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 07:45, Neil wrote:
Hi
I live in the Netherlands, ...
Every year that goes by I regret more and more not accepting the job
offer that Philips (Apeldorn) made to me in the late 80s.
Don't.
If you did accept it, there is a more than fair chance you would be out
of a job and got a drinking-habbit
It a nice country I live in:
Last couple of weeks it was several times in the news that a bunch of
yougsters attended a drinking party and went on untill they pass out.
Kids of 12 years old. Permanent brain damage.
I would almost opt for the Scandinavian mechanism: extremely strict and
horrible expensive.
After the First World War in the US, they took what appeared the logical step
and outlawed the admittedly toxic and often socially and medically damaging
substance, alcohol, altogether. You can probably justify such a step if you
are of an authoritarian bent that permits of the idea that the state can and
should criminalise behaviour that harms us.
But I suspect most of our US friends will agree that the result of prohibition
was not that US society became more sober, industrious, and comprised largely
of people with splendidly healthy livers, but that organised crime was handed
a leg up so massive that eighty years later the effects are still being felt.
You cannot legislate for good intent.
hw
--
Fergus Wilde
Chetham's Library
Long Millgate
Manchester
M3 1SB
Tel: 0161 834 7961
Fax: 0161 839 5797
http://www.chethams.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |