On 10/24/2007 12:35 AM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
- David Bolt <bcrafhfr@davjam.org> [10-23-07 12:27]:
I noticed. Interestingly enough, I notice that the message with the 846KiB uncompressed tiff as an attachment also has that same header. As to why the poster couldn't have used compression, I don't know. Saving it with Gimp as a PNG reduced it to 22KiB. A later post, also contained image attachments of 216KiB and 375KiB. These reduced to 17Kib and 25KiB.
I noticed that but didn't comment. You *are* correct that graphics should have been presented in the least imposing popular format. The presenter is/was being quite presumptious and inconsiderate. There are *still* list members on dial-up and/or measured service.
Sorry, I hadn't made it to the thread with (obvious to me now) the mentioned picture. My comment earlier was misinformed. I thought it was another "big" attachment. You guys are correct on this one. Sorry for the misinformed post. -- Joe Morris Registered Linux user 231871 running openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org