Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4244 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 10.3 benchmarking: slower than 10.2?
- From: nordi <nordi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:53:35 +0200
- Message-id: <4711304F.4070105@xxxxxxxxx>
Anders Johansson wrote:
I also tried killing services in runlevel 2, hoping to reach the performance of runlevel 1. I killed every demon I could find, unloaded some kernel modules... nothing changed. Since you said the benchmark uses signals for its timing: Is there anything that might send signals in one runlevel and not send them in another?
Regards
nordi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, runlevel 1 has nothing running, so anything you do will have the machine more or less to itself. I would be surprised if you didn't get higher scores thereHigher scores, yes. But I would expect 1% more, maybe even 5% more. But certainly not 100% higher performance. Otherwise that would mean the few services running in runlevel 2 eat up 50% of my CPU time.
I also tried killing services in runlevel 2, hoping to reach the performance of runlevel 1. I killed every demon I could find, unloaded some kernel modules... nothing changed. Since you said the benchmark uses signals for its timing: Is there anything that might send signals in one runlevel and not send them in another?
Regards
nordi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |