Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3752 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Re: subpixel hinting: why not out of the box?
- From: Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:16:46 +0200
- Message-id: <200710081816.46447.sh@xxxxxxx>
On Monday 08 October 2007 17:43, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > Well, I am sure you read the disclaimer at
> >
> > http://opensuse-community.org/SubpixelHinting
>
> Why so wimpy?
>
> It says "... might infringe ..."
IANAL. But let me put it this way: If the upstream authors of freetype were so
sure about themselves, would they disable it already in their sources? If
they are not so sure, why would we?
> Until and unless the legal question is raised and settled in some
> plaintiff's favor, there's very little real risk to anybody.
> The worst that could happen is a cease-and-desist request.
...plus a lawsuit for damages. Creative lawyers might be tempted to multiply
some random per-user amount of damage with the overall user base worldwide.
That kind of thing easily can add up to tens of millions (or more).
And until all that is settled, a Damocles sword of some phantastizillions
might be hanging over us. Even if the lawsuit comes out to naught - after
several years, like usual. Now why would we want that?
That workaround with a hint page how to re-enable that feature (on a web site
we cannot be held responsible for) might not be an ideal solution, but at
least it puts the company that pays us full-time SuSE/Novell developers not
at that kind of risk.
Just my 0.02€.
Kind regards
--
Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx> Penguin by conviction.
YaST2 Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Nürnberg, Germany
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Well, I am sure you read the disclaimer at
> >
> > http://opensuse-community.org/SubpixelHinting
>
> Why so wimpy?
>
> It says "... might infringe ..."
IANAL. But let me put it this way: If the upstream authors of freetype were so
sure about themselves, would they disable it already in their sources? If
they are not so sure, why would we?
> Until and unless the legal question is raised and settled in some
> plaintiff's favor, there's very little real risk to anybody.
> The worst that could happen is a cease-and-desist request.
...plus a lawsuit for damages. Creative lawyers might be tempted to multiply
some random per-user amount of damage with the overall user base worldwide.
That kind of thing easily can add up to tens of millions (or more).
And until all that is settled, a Damocles sword of some phantastizillions
might be hanging over us. Even if the lawsuit comes out to naught - after
several years, like usual. Now why would we want that?
That workaround with a hint page how to re-enable that feature (on a web site
we cannot be held responsible for) might not be an ideal solution, but at
least it puts the company that pays us full-time SuSE/Novell developers not
at that kind of risk.
Just my 0.02€.
Kind regards
--
Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx> Penguin by conviction.
YaST2 Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Nürnberg, Germany
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |