Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1962 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Gnome version of YAST vs KDE version
- From: "Benji Weber" <b.weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:28:06 +0100
- Message-id: <d6b310ce0709100328i35dd6aebl9db0e68ab6fefb0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 10/09/2007, Clayton <smaug42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We simply took the hard work done by Ricardo and Michael to create the
> > community-developed Gtk frontend.
>
> I do not ever want to fault the tremendous effort that took. On it's
> own, I think it is a very professionally done application, and I hope
> they continue working on improving Gnome and the toolset. The problem
> is... well.. I've stated the problem already.
>
> Making such a fundamental change in the workflow between Gnome and KDE
> a major issue in so many areas - documentation, external 3rd party
> support, actual toolset development (spreading limited resources now
> across 2 toolsets instead of focusing on one.. this was the reason
> given for selecting Tango icons for YAST in 10.3.. yet that same
> reasoning doesn't apply here?).
>
>
> > I see your point of support and also documentaiton is very similar issue.
> > However, the value of difference, trying out a different approaches is very
> > valuable.
>
> Right... makes sense... but... not as a default. The YAST tool is
> very important to openSUSE. Keeping it stable and predictable is so
> very important for support. I appreciate the need for change... if we
> didn't change, Linux development would stagnate.
Part of the problem is that the Qt package manager interface itself is
pretty dire, hopefully both can be improved significantly towards a
common consistent & usable interface in 10.3++.
So please do raise the issue on -project, 10.3 is not going to change
this late in release. For 10.3++ hopefully both versions can be fixed.
_
Benjamin Weber
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > We simply took the hard work done by Ricardo and Michael to create the
> > community-developed Gtk frontend.
>
> I do not ever want to fault the tremendous effort that took. On it's
> own, I think it is a very professionally done application, and I hope
> they continue working on improving Gnome and the toolset. The problem
> is... well.. I've stated the problem already.
>
> Making such a fundamental change in the workflow between Gnome and KDE
> a major issue in so many areas - documentation, external 3rd party
> support, actual toolset development (spreading limited resources now
> across 2 toolsets instead of focusing on one.. this was the reason
> given for selecting Tango icons for YAST in 10.3.. yet that same
> reasoning doesn't apply here?).
>
>
> > I see your point of support and also documentaiton is very similar issue.
> > However, the value of difference, trying out a different approaches is very
> > valuable.
>
> Right... makes sense... but... not as a default. The YAST tool is
> very important to openSUSE. Keeping it stable and predictable is so
> very important for support. I appreciate the need for change... if we
> didn't change, Linux development would stagnate.
Part of the problem is that the Qt package manager interface itself is
pretty dire, hopefully both can be improved significantly towards a
common consistent & usable interface in 10.3++.
So please do raise the issue on -project, 10.3 is not going to change
this late in release. For 10.3++ hopefully both versions can be fixed.
_
Benjamin Weber
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |