Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1962 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Gnome version of YAST vs KDE version
- From: Anders Johansson <ajohansson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:47:29 +0200
- Message-id: <200709091647.30085.ajohansson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sunday 09 September 2007 15:52:00 Clayton wrote:
> > I quite like the look of the QT version of YaST. It certainly a much
> > closer match to the console version, which is something I find myself
> > using more than the GUI version.
>
> Therein stands my point. The CLI version and the QT version are close
> enough in layout and style to be effectively the same. Walking
> through one or the other, you are in familiar territory. Then you
> fire up Gnome expecting consistent tools... and you're faced with that
> dogs breakfast mess of YAST. There is ZERO consistency. That is
> plain dumb. Consistency is critical in the interfaces that make SUSE
> stand out.
Isn't it more important to have internal consistency in the desktop you're
using? I think the gnome frontend to yast is quite similar to the gnome
control center, which means gnome users should feel at home in it
No, I don't particularly care for the gnome look-and-feel either, but I do
appreciate consistency. I don't want applications in my kde desktop with
reversed cancel/ok buttons, even if they were originally written for gnome
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I quite like the look of the QT version of YaST. It certainly a much
> > closer match to the console version, which is something I find myself
> > using more than the GUI version.
>
> Therein stands my point. The CLI version and the QT version are close
> enough in layout and style to be effectively the same. Walking
> through one or the other, you are in familiar territory. Then you
> fire up Gnome expecting consistent tools... and you're faced with that
> dogs breakfast mess of YAST. There is ZERO consistency. That is
> plain dumb. Consistency is critical in the interfaces that make SUSE
> stand out.
Isn't it more important to have internal consistency in the desktop you're
using? I think the gnome frontend to yast is quite similar to the gnome
control center, which means gnome users should feel at home in it
No, I don't particularly care for the gnome look-and-feel either, but I do
appreciate consistency. I don't want applications in my kde desktop with
reversed cancel/ok buttons, even if they were originally written for gnome
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |