Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1875 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse] Gnome version of YAST vs KDE version
- From: Clayton <smaug42@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 14:39:03 +0200
- Message-id: <e29967880709090539t6c790abrf9efc31baf180c31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Just wondering... why is it that the Gnome version of YAST is so
dramatically different from the KDE one in openSUSE 10.3 Beta3?
I haven't used Gnome on SUSE in a very long time, but I don't remember
YAST being any different between KDE and Gnome in previous versions.
The Gnome version of YAST is unwieldy and hard to use - not that the
KDE one is a good example, but it is certainly much much better than
the Gnome one.
Isn't it a bit of a major usability issue if the core tools that set
SUSE apart from all the other distributions are so
inconsistent/different?
Also.. who thought that the Gnome version of YAST software installer
is a good thing? Was it actually tested with users? Does anyone else
find it to be a very poor UI design?
C.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
dramatically different from the KDE one in openSUSE 10.3 Beta3?
I haven't used Gnome on SUSE in a very long time, but I don't remember
YAST being any different between KDE and Gnome in previous versions.
The Gnome version of YAST is unwieldy and hard to use - not that the
KDE one is a good example, but it is certainly much much better than
the Gnome one.
Isn't it a bit of a major usability issue if the core tools that set
SUSE apart from all the other distributions are so
inconsistent/different?
Also.. who thought that the Gnome version of YAST software installer
is a good thing? Was it actually tested with users? Does anyone else
find it to be a very poor UI design?
C.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |