On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:58:51PM +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 12:48 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Aug 29 2007 08:09, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:28 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
I would rather install on another partition Beta 2 or wait few days for Beta3 (Sept. 6th). That way you get all software updated and if it doesn't work well, there is good old 10.0 installation.
We are planning our SUSE release support for the coming year. Our primary platform is 10.0. We can't decide if we should go with 10.2 or 10.3. 10.2 we know. 10.3 is unknown. We need to decide/commit in the next month. I think it make be a bit close for choosing 10.3.
Or you could use 10.2 plus a 3rd-party 2.6.22. Webpin will tell.
Webpin? I found http://benjiweber.co.uk:8080/webpin/
Is that what you mean? What 3rd party kernel package does all the other things needed to go from 2.6.13 to 2.6.22. Or whatever one introduced big udev changes.
I guess he meant his own kernel. You can use the 2.6.22 kernel from 10.3 on 10.2. Only thing affected is likely udev/hal. Ciao, -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org