Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1962 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] updating problem (opensususeupdater)
- From: G T Smith <grahamsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:52:36 +0100
- Message-id: <465FDE54.5010100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:11, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Please DO NOT top post.
>> [x4]
>>
>> It makes it really hard to read when looking through the archives.
>
> Perhaps we could interest you in a nice thread-aware mail reader? Or
> convince you to simply follow along, rather than try to skip to the
> end?
>
>
>> --
>> Ken Schneider
>
>
> RRS
I think the problem he is really more bothered about is when some things
are at the top and some things at the bottom plus bits put in the
middle. After a while the result can get somewhat incoherent. Even while
following a particular thread it can become difficult to follow the plot
as a consequence.
I think a little common sense is required here. While I (nowadays)
prefer things to be bottom posted, I think it might be useful if one
responds to a thread consistently and not mix top and bottom posting,
(and edit out stuff which is not relevant to a response). With the focus
on retaining some coherence rather than religiously applying a convention.
I have noticed other respondents take the time to split replies on more
complex queries into multiple more focussed comments, a practice I
should think about adopting.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGX95UasN0sSnLmgIRAljNAKD5QTPsFMNox2hwprVFmMhhlwwRPACeJvmj
oJwx8y56GqIUpT9h0uklIsE=
=S3RI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hash: SHA1
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:11, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Please DO NOT top post.
>> [x4]
>>
>> It makes it really hard to read when looking through the archives.
>
> Perhaps we could interest you in a nice thread-aware mail reader? Or
> convince you to simply follow along, rather than try to skip to the
> end?
>
>
>> --
>> Ken Schneider
>
>
> RRS
I think the problem he is really more bothered about is when some things
are at the top and some things at the bottom plus bits put in the
middle. After a while the result can get somewhat incoherent. Even while
following a particular thread it can become difficult to follow the plot
as a consequence.
I think a little common sense is required here. While I (nowadays)
prefer things to be bottom posted, I think it might be useful if one
responds to a thread consistently and not mix top and bottom posting,
(and edit out stuff which is not relevant to a response). With the focus
on retaining some coherence rather than religiously applying a convention.
I have noticed other respondents take the time to split replies on more
complex queries into multiple more focussed comments, a practice I
should think about adopting.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGX95UasN0sSnLmgIRAljNAKD5QTPsFMNox2hwprVFmMhhlwwRPACeJvmj
oJwx8y56GqIUpT9h0uklIsE=
=S3RI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |