Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2714 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] RE: Suitable File Systems
- From: John Andersen <jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:54:13 -0800
- Message-id: <200705131554.13859.jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sunday 13 May 2007, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> The Sunday 2007-05-13 at 11:52 -0800, John Andersen wrote:
> > Ext2 and 3 are equally candidates for dead-end-ism.
> > The only reason suse re-emphasized ext2/3 is because
> > RedHat does all the maintenance for them.
>
> Its more complex than that. SuSE people explained in detail at the time
> why they were no longer pushing reiserfs as default at install time.
True, but I was only addressing why they chose to focus on Ext2/3
instead of XFS (or JFS or insert favorite) once they made the decision to
switch away from Reiser.
It certainly wasn't done for technical reasons, seems like mostly a cost
issue.
--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> The Sunday 2007-05-13 at 11:52 -0800, John Andersen wrote:
> > Ext2 and 3 are equally candidates for dead-end-ism.
> > The only reason suse re-emphasized ext2/3 is because
> > RedHat does all the maintenance for them.
>
> Its more complex than that. SuSE people explained in detail at the time
> why they were no longer pushing reiserfs as default at install time.
True, but I was only addressing why they chose to focus on Ext2/3
instead of XFS (or JFS or insert favorite) once they made the decision to
switch away from Reiser.
It certainly wasn't done for technical reasons, seems like mostly a cost
issue.
--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |