Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2859 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] 4GB computer slowdown
- From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:47:53 -0700
- Message-id: <200705110747.53496.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
On Friday 11 May 2007 07:29, Petr Klíma wrote:
> Well, it's quite surprising, but Linux is by order of magnitude more
> sensitive to hardware stability. Memory errors, overclocking and such
> may cause Linux to produce weird errors while Windows run
> smoothly. ...
I know this is the conventional wisdom, and I don't really dispute it,
but I am at a loss to explain why it would be so.
Does anyone know where this extra sensitivity to marginal hardware
originates? Why would Windows be more tolerant? Do they do something to
be more robust (e.g., catch hardware fault exceptions and attempt
retries or some such tactic)?
> ...
>
> Cheers, Tosuja
Randall Schulz
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Well, it's quite surprising, but Linux is by order of magnitude more
> sensitive to hardware stability. Memory errors, overclocking and such
> may cause Linux to produce weird errors while Windows run
> smoothly. ...
I know this is the conventional wisdom, and I don't really dispute it,
but I am at a loss to explain why it would be so.
Does anyone know where this extra sensitivity to marginal hardware
originates? Why would Windows be more tolerant? Do they do something to
be more robust (e.g., catch hardware fault exceptions and attempt
retries or some such tactic)?
> ...
>
> Cheers, Tosuja
Randall Schulz
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |