Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3468 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse] Re: the new openSUSE kernel and the IDE
- From: Eberhard Roloff <tuxebi@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:17:41 +0200
- Message-id: <f07c3l$4gr$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Adam Tauno Williams
> <adamtaunowilliams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Should we, as a community, take some steps to ensure best experience
>> > for our Susers ? (SUSE users) :)
>> > One thing that comes to mind, is to symlink (or even hardlink?) sda
>> > block devices to hda files, so that suser's transition will be
>> > transparent.
>>
>> I really think this is a non-issue; there is a long existing solution
>> to this problem: LVM. Drives are scanned and assigned to volume groups
>> dynamically.
>>
>> Use LVM.
>>
>> > This will NOT solve the 15-partitions problem, but this *will* save
>>
>> I strongly suspect that 15 partitions per drives is *extremely* rare.
>>
>> Use LVM and you can carve up your disks as many ways as you want.
>>
>> > all the fstabs, backup scripts and other system software from braking
>> > with a new openSUSE release. This should be made as a
>> > backward-compatibility measure.
>
> LVM is a non-solution. It doesn't supports Windows interoperability.
> Same goes for SoftRAID.
> I need to stay Windows compatible.
>
In what way is your linux partition setup "windows compatible"?
I what way does LVM spoil your "Windows Compatibility"?
regards
Eberhard
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 4/15/07, Adam Tauno Williams
> <adamtaunowilliams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Should we, as a community, take some steps to ensure best experience
>> > for our Susers ? (SUSE users) :)
>> > One thing that comes to mind, is to symlink (or even hardlink?) sda
>> > block devices to hda files, so that suser's transition will be
>> > transparent.
>>
>> I really think this is a non-issue; there is a long existing solution
>> to this problem: LVM. Drives are scanned and assigned to volume groups
>> dynamically.
>>
>> Use LVM.
>>
>> > This will NOT solve the 15-partitions problem, but this *will* save
>>
>> I strongly suspect that 15 partitions per drives is *extremely* rare.
>>
>> Use LVM and you can carve up your disks as many ways as you want.
>>
>> > all the fstabs, backup scripts and other system software from braking
>> > with a new openSUSE release. This should be made as a
>> > backward-compatibility measure.
>
> LVM is a non-solution. It doesn't supports Windows interoperability.
> Same goes for SoftRAID.
> I need to stay Windows compatible.
>
In what way is your linux partition setup "windows compatible"?
I what way does LVM spoil your "Windows Compatibility"?
regards
Eberhard
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |