Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3464 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Call for Testing: openSUSE 10.2 Bootloader Test
- From: John Andersen <jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:41:46 -0800
- Message-id: <200704162341.47403.jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Monday 16 April 2007, Thomas Hertweck wrote:
> STDIN wrote:
> > [...]
> > I tried, its not there:
> > # modprobe usbfs
> > FATAL: Module usbfs not found.
>
> As already mentioned several times on this list: usbfs is not a
> self-contained kernel module. It's part of usbcore which is most
> likely compiled as a module. Therefore, you should get your
> USB_DEVICEFS with usbcore.ko if this feature had been enabled
> in .config at compile time (which is true for kernels to be
> included in 10.3 and the latest patched kernel for 10.2). All
> you need to do is mount the filesystem, or change /etc/fstab to
> do it automatically when the system starts up.
>
> Cheers, Th.
Well that brings it full circle then, doesn't it Thomas?
The OP posted that he DID try the new kernel (the subject of this thread)
and it did NOT work for him, and others (mistakenly) suggested he modprobe
it, only to be told by you that its in the kernel and he need do nothing of
the sort.
Its all starting to sound a little like a Monty Python skit isn't it?
--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
> STDIN wrote:
> > [...]
> > I tried, its not there:
> > # modprobe usbfs
> > FATAL: Module usbfs not found.
>
> As already mentioned several times on this list: usbfs is not a
> self-contained kernel module. It's part of usbcore which is most
> likely compiled as a module. Therefore, you should get your
> USB_DEVICEFS with usbcore.ko if this feature had been enabled
> in .config at compile time (which is true for kernels to be
> included in 10.3 and the latest patched kernel for 10.2). All
> you need to do is mount the filesystem, or change /etc/fstab to
> do it automatically when the system starts up.
>
> Cheers, Th.
Well that brings it full circle then, doesn't it Thomas?
The OP posted that he DID try the new kernel (the subject of this thread)
and it did NOT work for him, and others (mistakenly) suggested he modprobe
it, only to be told by you that its in the kernel and he need do nothing of
the sort.
Its all starting to sound a little like a Monty Python skit isn't it?
--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
| < Previous | Next > |