Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3464 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] off-list replies
- From: Sandy Drobic <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:52:52 +0200
- Message-id: <461E2BA4.4060306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Carlos E. R. wrote:
> The Thursday 2007-04-12 at 13:54 +0200, Sandy Drobic wrote:
>
>> I set a reply-to header to the list, so that the default for a reply is
>> directed to the list.
>
> And I have procmail set to overwrite it using formail, so it is lost :-p
>
> However, I set it to the list, so that I can use Pine easily.
Whatever, as long as it works. (^-°)
>>>> I equate off-list with spam, and unless I specifically give you
>>>> permission to
>>>> email me, you don't have the right.
>>> This is rediculous.
>> Why? Aside from the annoying spam to the list addresses (spammers like web
>> archives!) the purpuse of a support mailinglist is to help each other and
>> have the archive available as a research base. Private replies defeat this
>> purpose.
>
>> For these reasons I do not understand why you think it is ridiculous.
>
> He thinks it is ridiculous to consider private emails as spam, I
> understand. It may be a nuisance, but not that much. My filters are clever
> enough to separate list replies, CCs, and directs.
I don't need filters because my server is rejecting these Mails hard. May
the lazy guy wonder why he is getting these bounces.
>> Sometimes I get private replies because the requested logs or
>> configuration files contain private data, but otherwise I see no reason
>> for private replies. Being lazy on your part does not constitute a good
>> reason for private replies.
>
> Most of them are simply mistakes. The fact is that many mail clients are
> not list aware and friendly - not even Pine - thus people may get confused
> at first and email direct by accident. Then, they revert to reply to all,
> which is another nuisance, but not a big one.
>
> SuSE version of thunderbird contains a hidden setting to modify "reply
> all" behaviour so that it sends to the list instead. I forgot how I
> activated it, though.
For a long time I used "reply-all" in Thunderbird and edited the
recipients, then I discovered a plugin for List Reply, so I only have to
remember to click on "Reply List".
--
Sandy
List replies only please!
Please address PMs to: news-reply2 (@) japantest (.) homelinux (.) com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> The Thursday 2007-04-12 at 13:54 +0200, Sandy Drobic wrote:
>
>> I set a reply-to header to the list, so that the default for a reply is
>> directed to the list.
>
> And I have procmail set to overwrite it using formail, so it is lost :-p
>
> However, I set it to the list, so that I can use Pine easily.
Whatever, as long as it works. (^-°)
>>>> I equate off-list with spam, and unless I specifically give you
>>>> permission to
>>>> email me, you don't have the right.
>>> This is rediculous.
>> Why? Aside from the annoying spam to the list addresses (spammers like web
>> archives!) the purpuse of a support mailinglist is to help each other and
>> have the archive available as a research base. Private replies defeat this
>> purpose.
>
>> For these reasons I do not understand why you think it is ridiculous.
>
> He thinks it is ridiculous to consider private emails as spam, I
> understand. It may be a nuisance, but not that much. My filters are clever
> enough to separate list replies, CCs, and directs.
I don't need filters because my server is rejecting these Mails hard. May
the lazy guy wonder why he is getting these bounces.
>> Sometimes I get private replies because the requested logs or
>> configuration files contain private data, but otherwise I see no reason
>> for private replies. Being lazy on your part does not constitute a good
>> reason for private replies.
>
> Most of them are simply mistakes. The fact is that many mail clients are
> not list aware and friendly - not even Pine - thus people may get confused
> at first and email direct by accident. Then, they revert to reply to all,
> which is another nuisance, but not a big one.
>
> SuSE version of thunderbird contains a hidden setting to modify "reply
> all" behaviour so that it sends to the list instead. I forgot how I
> activated it, though.
For a long time I used "reply-all" in Thunderbird and edited the
recipients, then I discovered a plugin for List Reply, so I only have to
remember to click on "Reply List".
--
Sandy
List replies only please!
Please address PMs to: news-reply2 (@) japantest (.) homelinux (.) com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |