Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3135 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] samba vs cifs ... what's the diff?
- From: Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:22:24 -0400
- Message-id: <20070315122224.GI21213@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* John Andersen <jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [03-15-07 01:10]:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > "sales losses" are quite difficult for a product that is mostly downloaded.
> >
> > The next 10.2 kernel update will include USBFS again btw.
>
> Cool, use support returns for Vmware. How soon?
posted in this forum 12 Mar 2007:
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:55:59 -0400
From: Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri@xxxxxxxxx>
To: opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Kernel Building Resources & Recommendations
Message-ID: <20070312205559.GN9942@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <45F5BADD.6000005@xxxxxx>
* Thomas Hertweck <Thomas.Hertweck@xxxxxx> [03-12-07 16:48]:
[...]
> As I wrote in my last email, there are several ways to deal with this
> problem. If you have to support many systems and not just your local
> desktop system, then the simplest way might be an RPM package that
> replaces the default usbcore.ko (from the SuSE kernel installation)
> with a new (your own) version that has USB_DEVICEFS enabled. This might
> minimize the possible side-effects as only a single file is changed.
[...]
16.55 wahoo:~ > rpm -q --changelog kernel-default | head
(none)* Fri Mar 09 2007 gregkh@xxxxxxx
- Enable CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS (#210899 and a zillion others.) Turns
out that vmware isn't going to change anything, so making our
users (and executives) have to build their own kernels is not
something we should be doing. I was wrong, sorry.
16:55 wahoo:~ > rpm -q kernel-default
kernel-default-2.6.18.8-146.1
--
Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
--
Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > "sales losses" are quite difficult for a product that is mostly downloaded.
> >
> > The next 10.2 kernel update will include USBFS again btw.
>
> Cool, use support returns for Vmware. How soon?
posted in this forum 12 Mar 2007:
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:55:59 -0400
From: Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri@xxxxxxxxx>
To: opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Kernel Building Resources & Recommendations
Message-ID: <20070312205559.GN9942@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <45F5BADD.6000005@xxxxxx>
* Thomas Hertweck <Thomas.Hertweck@xxxxxx> [03-12-07 16:48]:
[...]
> As I wrote in my last email, there are several ways to deal with this
> problem. If you have to support many systems and not just your local
> desktop system, then the simplest way might be an RPM package that
> replaces the default usbcore.ko (from the SuSE kernel installation)
> with a new (your own) version that has USB_DEVICEFS enabled. This might
> minimize the possible side-effects as only a single file is changed.
[...]
16.55 wahoo:~ > rpm -q --changelog kernel-default | head
(none)* Fri Mar 09 2007 gregkh@xxxxxxx
- Enable CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS (#210899 and a zillion others.) Turns
out that vmware isn't going to change anything, so making our
users (and executives) have to build their own kernels is not
something we should be doing. I was wrong, sorry.
16:55 wahoo:~ > rpm -q kernel-default
kernel-default-2.6.18.8-146.1
--
Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
--
Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |