Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3135 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] samba vs cifs ... what's the diff?
- From: "Peter Van Lone" <petervl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:01:15 -0500
- Message-id: <68b791330703122201j420fa062q4665234b1c17663f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 3/12/07, John Andersen <jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ahh .. ok, perfect.
So the appropriate comparison is NOT samba vs cifs, but rather smbfs
vs cifs. Both are client protocols/virtual file system
implementations.
So, from google reading, cifs was apparently microsofts addition to
the original SMB file system spec ... and now, it is a somewhat newer
vfs that can exist along side of or instead of smbfs. Theoretically it
offers, newer/better/fancier services/access to remote SAMBA provided
storage.
About right?
Thanx John!
Peter
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Samba is a service that allows you to PUBLISH shares for other
computers to mount.
smbfs and cifs are file systems that allow your Linux box to
MOUNT a share published by a samab server or a windows
box. (perhaps to do a backup or some such)
ahh .. ok, perfect.
So the appropriate comparison is NOT samba vs cifs, but rather smbfs
vs cifs. Both are client protocols/virtual file system
implementations.
So, from google reading, cifs was apparently microsofts addition to
the original SMB file system spec ... and now, it is a somewhat newer
vfs that can exist along side of or instead of smbfs. Theoretically it
offers, newer/better/fancier services/access to remote SAMBA provided
storage.
About right?
Thanx John!
Peter
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |