Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4498 mails)

["Theo v. Werkhoven" <theo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mon, 13 Nov 2006, by constant@xxxxxxxxxxx:

> On Monday 13 November 2006 06:30, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> > Mon, 13 Nov 2006, by constant@xxxxxxxxxxx:
> > > On Sunday 12 November 2006 17:18, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> > > > There have been examples from people explaining howto let kmail
> > > > re-write a(ny) header to whatever you wish.
> > It was in a thread about the ***SPAM*** in the Subject a few weeks
> > ago (on the suse-e ML).
> Missed it because I did not follow the SPAM  subject in detail. Lost interest 
> after the first ten email's. Why did you not inform me that Randall Schulz 
> gave you a direct information that "KMail filter actions can edit headers 
> directly." Would have made it much easier. Found it and use it in the 
> meantime.

I'm not using kmail as you can see in the headers, so I have no
vested interest to search back in the archives.

> > > > Please repair your signature, and let it start with
> > >
> > > No idea where you are talking about. Neither about the repair suggestion
> > > nor about the stripping of stripping signatures.
> Never felt that I missed the stripping thingy. 

If there's a job that a program can do for me I'm always happy,
doesn't matter if it's 2 lines or 10.

> > Others did, so it's not my English that is b0rked.
>  Well, try it Dutch ;). Or let us do it via Skype.

You have my account.

> > Maybe some  Googling would help you out?
> Stripping on Google did of course turn out a lot of material (19.600.000), 
> stripping signature still a lot (1.450.000) and SuSE added gave only a few 
> (44.200) but still to much to wade through if I have no idea why I should 
> bother anyhow.

"strip signatures" gave intelligible answers on the first page for
me (number 7 e.g.).

> > It's not so very difficult to see the difference between the
> > signature you gave and e.g. mine.
> Nice to see now that your lines are automatically stripped in this response. 
> But as I try to snip anyhow superfluous text from responses  it was never a 
> problem for me.

It's not so much a problem, but, like I said,  something a(ny)
"well-behaving" mailclient does. It's a "polite" thing to do for a
mailclient, like cutting text and in-between replying is for us.

> The signature lines were taken from one of the former discussions and mine 
> looks as follows.
> #!/bin/bash echo "Powered by SuSE 10.1 Kernel 2.6.16.21-0.25-default  KDE 
> 3.5.4  Kmail 1.9.4" uptime
> In your case you seem to have used the input file. Would be nice to give me 
> the command line for a "correct" signature. <space> does not seem to work in 
> bash :).

#!/bin/bash
cat <<EOL
-- 
Powered by SuSE 10.1 Kernel 2.6.16.21-0.25-default KDE 3.5.4 Kmail 1.9.4
$(uptime)
EOL
# /* notice the extra space after the two dashes! */

Theo
-- 
Theo v. Werkhoven    Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org
ICBM 52 13 26N , 4 29 47E.     +      ICQ: 277217131
SUSE 9.2                       +   Jabber: muadib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kernel 2.6.8                   +   See headers for PGP/GPG info.
Claimer: any email I receive will become my property. Disclaimers do not apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx