Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4498 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Fault tolerance in Linux Disk I/O
- From: Kenneth Schneider <suse-list3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:28:22 -0500
- Message-id: <1162441702.5639.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:14 +1000, Intrusion Detection Account 000
wrote:
> Ken you may be the only one who can shed any light on my question as
> it is difficult and needs an answer from a long standing UNIX/Linux
> user.
> That being said anyone else who knows the answer or can contribute
> please jump in
>
> Linux coming from a Unix Server now being a desktop solution I was
> wondering what fault tolerance there is in respect to verifying reads
> and writes to the HDD or NFS Server.
>
> Some server O/S employ HOTFIX to ensure a file is written correctly to
> the hard Disk and Transitional Tracking.
>
> Are any of these left over in a Linux Workstation. This goes with my
> question about verification of files.
>
> I was faithfully backing up my /home directory and sub-directories and
> list my entire system which was my fault and a long story. When it
> came to recover the backup achieve the achieve header had been
> corrupted. I used KDAR to do the backup and it has no verify options
> and KDAR could not read the achieve file.
>
> My question to you is are there in inbuilt file integrity listed above
> to ensure every write and read are performed actually and checked by
> any O/S fault tolerance systems
>
I tried to use kdar and had nothing but problems with it. I think the
problems you experienced are with the application kdar and not with the
linux system it self. If _reliable_ backups are a must I suggest using a
commercial backup program like Microlite BackupEdge. It employs good
verification to ensure a reliable backup has been preformed. You can
download a 60 day eval for free to test.
--
Ken Schneider
UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> Ken you may be the only one who can shed any light on my question as
> it is difficult and needs an answer from a long standing UNIX/Linux
> user.
> That being said anyone else who knows the answer or can contribute
> please jump in
>
> Linux coming from a Unix Server now being a desktop solution I was
> wondering what fault tolerance there is in respect to verifying reads
> and writes to the HDD or NFS Server.
>
> Some server O/S employ HOTFIX to ensure a file is written correctly to
> the hard Disk and Transitional Tracking.
>
> Are any of these left over in a Linux Workstation. This goes with my
> question about verification of files.
>
> I was faithfully backing up my /home directory and sub-directories and
> list my entire system which was my fault and a long story. When it
> came to recover the backup achieve the achieve header had been
> corrupted. I used KDAR to do the backup and it has no verify options
> and KDAR could not read the achieve file.
>
> My question to you is are there in inbuilt file integrity listed above
> to ensure every write and read are performed actually and checked by
> any O/S fault tolerance systems
>
I tried to use kdar and had nothing but problems with it. I think the
problems you experienced are with the application kdar and not with the
linux system it self. If _reliable_ backups are a must I suggest using a
commercial backup program like Microlite BackupEdge. It employs good
verification to ensure a reliable backup has been preformed. You can
download a 60 day eval for free to test.
--
Ken Schneider
UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |