Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3139 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] recommend a SSL sertificate issuer for our website?
- From: Mike Noble <mgnoble@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 16:08:12 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <451FE844.8020703@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.registerfly.com/ssl
Mike
张韡武 wrote:
> I don't like the way go daddy boast in the news, moving to Windows is
> more likely a strategic plan to affect stat percentage of Windows being
> used as web server by including parked domains.
>
> Now our go daddy SSL certificate is expiring (no surprising we choose go
> daddy the first time: because they made more advertisements), I wish to
> take this chance to use another certificate issuer. We need cheap
> Intranet level certificate, from a certificate issuer that is more
> Linux-friendly. Which certificate issuer Linux admins prefer? For me not
> necessarily a USA company.
>
> In my case we cannot use CACert.org.
>
Mike
张韡武 wrote:
> I don't like the way go daddy boast in the news, moving to Windows is
> more likely a strategic plan to affect stat percentage of Windows being
> used as web server by including parked domains.
>
> Now our go daddy SSL certificate is expiring (no surprising we choose go
> daddy the first time: because they made more advertisements), I wish to
> take this chance to use another certificate issuer. We need cheap
> Intranet level certificate, from a certificate issuer that is more
> Linux-friendly. Which certificate issuer Linux admins prefer? For me not
> necessarily a USA company.
>
> In my case we cannot use CACert.org.
>
| < Previous | Next > |