Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3506 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] sempron 32 or 64 bit
- From: Primm <lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 06:41:11 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <200609070842.30836.lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Lemme just be clear - the issues I had with 64bit was three versions
> ago, and just for desktop related stuff. On a server it's a no-brainer
> - 64bit unless you have to run some third party software that's giving
> you hassles.
>koffiejunkielistlurker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hans
I tried my original 32 bit dvd in the new AMD whilst attempting to grab the
x86-64 from opensuse (3 attempts at broken Md5's).
On a user basis, one would not know it was a 64 bit box. eg KDE looks and
feels just the same. The pleasant surprize comes with apache, mysql and php
The database driven website which serves lot's of hi res jpg's really does
fly under the new system. The jpg's appear at once rather than gradually from
the top of the screen.
I'm still not really sure why 64 bit is faster but I would certainly recommend
it having compared both.
Steve.
> Lemme just be clear - the issues I had with 64bit was three versions
> ago, and just for desktop related stuff. On a server it's a no-brainer
> - 64bit unless you have to run some third party software that's giving
> you hassles.
>koffiejunkielistlurker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hans
I tried my original 32 bit dvd in the new AMD whilst attempting to grab the
x86-64 from opensuse (3 attempts at broken Md5's).
On a user basis, one would not know it was a 64 bit box. eg KDE looks and
feels just the same. The pleasant surprize comes with apache, mysql and php
The database driven website which serves lot's of hi res jpg's really does
fly under the new system. The jpg's appear at once rather than gradually from
the top of the screen.
I'm still not really sure why 64 bit is faster but I would certainly recommend
it having compared both.
Steve.
| < Previous | Next > |