Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3232 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] slow fps with fglrx driver
  • From: Robert Lewis <rll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:53:24 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <44D37B7B.80108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Apparently the fgl_glxgears is designed to work with the fglrx driver which
is for the ATI cards. At least, that is what I think I am reading but
would like
confirmation. Therefor, no alternative to glxgears for Nvidia is
possible for me.
My readings look like:
920 frames in 5.0 seconds = 183.864 FPS
1025 frames in 5.0 seconds = 204.991 FPS
789 frames in 5.0 seconds = 157.792 FPS
972 frames in 5.0 seconds = 194.390 FPS
954 frames in 5.0 seconds = 190.791 FPS
1019 frames in 5.0 seconds = 203.791 FPS

Pretty sad, but as I said the 3D games seem to work well anyway.

Cheers,
Bob

Peter Bradley wrote:
> Robert Lewis wrote:
>> I have an nvidia card and glxgears is also displaying painfully slow
>> values
>> however, all the 3D stuff works fast so glxgears is not dealing well
>> with this card.
>> Some friends nvidia card on SUSE 10.1 does will with glxgears just
>> not mine.
>>
>> I nosed around on the DVD for fgl_glxgears and on the WEB looking for it
>> but can't find. Will fgl_glxgears work properly on nvidia and if so
>> where do
>> I get it to test?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bob
>>
> Me too - but only since I installed the latest ATI driver. Before
> that I was getting really good FPS rates. Having said that, the gears
> still seemed to be going at the same speed, so I wonder if something
> in the new drivers is affecting the FPS output.
>
> I found fgl_glxgears already installed, with the new drivers:
>
> peter@linux:~> locate fgl_glxgears
> /usr/X11R6/bin/fgl_glxgears
> peter@linux:~> which fgl_glxgears
> /usr/X11R6/bin/fgl_glxgears
> peter@linux:~> fgl_glxgears
> Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
> 2618 frames in 5.0 seconds = 523.600 FPS
> 2928 frames in 5.0 seconds = 585.600 FPS
> 3201 frames in 5.0 seconds = 640.200 FPS
> 3210 frames in 5.0 seconds = 642.000 FPS
> 3213 frames in 5.0 seconds = 642.600 FPS
> 3206 frames in 5.0 seconds = 641.200 FPS
> 3193 frames in 5.0 seconds = 638.600 FPS
> peter@linux:~>
>
> Still not brilliant, but better than glxgears reports.
>
> HTH
>
> Peter
>
>

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups