Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3232 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] [OT] Proposed SuSE List Etiquette
  • From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:32:12 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <44E0EBE0.9060602@xxxxxx>
On 06/08/14 17:08 (GMT-0400) ken apparently typed:

> William Gallafent wrote:

>> On Monday 14 August 2006 09:48, ken wrote:

>> When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the
>> mailbox(es) to which the author of the message suggests that
>> replies be sent.

> I suspected (was afraid) that this particular sentence was the heart of
> the storm. Taken out of context, it does sound definitive.

The RFC is deficient in presuming anyone knows the meaning of "author".
I really don't care who wrote the content. I only care who sent it to
me. The writer of the content did not send it to me, so I really don't
care what he wants or what his headers included or not. The listserv
sent it to me, so as far as I'm concerned, until a distinction is made
in the RFC for list mail, the listserv is the author, not the content
writer.
--
"Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time
we will reap a harvest if we do not give up." Galatians 6:9 NIV

Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups