Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3605 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] KDE updates 10.1
- From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:34:28 +0200
- Message-id: <20060601113428.GC20854@xxxxxxx>
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:37:13AM -0400, suse@xxxxxx wrote:
> Marlier, Ian wrote:
> >
> > You would use an OS that's been in release for two weeks in a production
> > environment?
> >
> > While I agree that it's nice to have the latest and greatest, the desire
> > for stability generally suggests that a "waiting period" is a Good
> > Thing. That holds whether you're talking about SuSE, SuSE-OSS, SLES,
> > Windows Server, etc etc etc. Once the software is in release, stick it
> > on a test system, see how it works...if it doesn't work, then
> > back-burner it until the problems are fixed, and then test again. Wash,
> > rinse, repeat :-)
>
> Unfortunately, every release of SuSE is on a clock. Two years until
Thats why we had to ship ... Or just do not ship the SUSE Linux 10.1
at all.
> The complaint is that the new system is quite well broken, and SuSE
> doesn't seem to much care... If you read their comments, it's all as if
> this were just a minor bug that nobody should really care about, to be
> discussed on the development lists and looked at for improvement in a
> later version...
We do care, rest assured.
Ciao, Marcus
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
> Marlier, Ian wrote:
> >
> > You would use an OS that's been in release for two weeks in a production
> > environment?
> >
> > While I agree that it's nice to have the latest and greatest, the desire
> > for stability generally suggests that a "waiting period" is a Good
> > Thing. That holds whether you're talking about SuSE, SuSE-OSS, SLES,
> > Windows Server, etc etc etc. Once the software is in release, stick it
> > on a test system, see how it works...if it doesn't work, then
> > back-burner it until the problems are fixed, and then test again. Wash,
> > rinse, repeat :-)
>
> Unfortunately, every release of SuSE is on a clock. Two years until
Thats why we had to ship ... Or just do not ship the SUSE Linux 10.1
at all.
> The complaint is that the new system is quite well broken, and SuSE
> doesn't seem to much care... If you read their comments, it's all as if
> this were just a minor bug that nobody should really care about, to be
> discussed on the development lists and looked at for improvement in a
> later version...
We do care, rest assured.
Ciao, Marcus
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |