Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3605 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Re: And another 10.1 showstopper
- From: James Knott <james.knott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:51:55 -0400
- Message-id: <4480508B.9040402@xxxxxxxxxx>
Peter Nikolic wrote:
> On Friday 02 June 2006 05:21, Rajko M wrote:
>
>> Popular myth: "They didn't develop anything after DOS"
>> Well, they did.
>
> they did not even develope DOS theft comes to mind ..
>
>
>
IIRC, they bought it from Seattle Computer Products, *AFTER* they sold
it to IBM. Even back then MS was showing it's lack of business ethics.
Also, Q-DOS, which eventually became MS-DOS & PC-DOS was originally
inteded as a development system for SCP, while they waited for CP/M-86
to be released. Since it wasn't originally intended as a commercial OS,
it had a lot of deficiencies, which carried over into MS-DOS and PC-DOS.
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
> On Friday 02 June 2006 05:21, Rajko M wrote:
>
>> Popular myth: "They didn't develop anything after DOS"
>> Well, they did.
>
> they did not even develope DOS theft comes to mind ..
>
>
>
IIRC, they bought it from Seattle Computer Products, *AFTER* they sold
it to IBM. Even back then MS was showing it's lack of business ethics.
Also, Q-DOS, which eventually became MS-DOS & PC-DOS was originally
inteded as a development system for SCP, while they waited for CP/M-86
to be released. Since it wasn't originally intended as a commercial OS,
it had a lot of deficiencies, which carried over into MS-DOS and PC-DOS.
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |