Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3605 mails)

[Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 18:30 schrieb Stephan Binner:
> If the version number or first part of the revision changed it's likely.
> Not if second revision part changed then it was rebuilt to guarantee
> compatiblity (not saying that every underlying change breaks it, it's just
> to be sure).

Hi,

currently I have

kdebase3-3.5.3-3.6

the first part of the revision is the fourth 3 in the string? and the second 
part is the 6?

I have an additional question: 

Currently I try to automatically update with yast and have the normal Suse 
updates, KDE3 and KDE3 backports activated. But the tool currently reports a 
conflict:

kdebase3-SuSE-10.1-58.3 conflicts with kdebase3-3.5.3-3.6

kdebase3-SuSE-10.1-58 on the other hand does not conflict with kdebase3. I 
know that kde3 backports and the updates do not support the new kde3 versions 
but in my opinion it should be able to provide packages that do not conflict 
between the three repositories.

Going back to kde 3.5.1 is not an option because some programms do not like 
the config files written by their versions from kde 3.5.2 and higher. I made 
this observation when I started kde from suse 10.1 after having used kde 
3.5.2 on 9.3 for some time.

Christoph

-- 
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx